The challenge
The issue is shared. The information isn’t.
Quality and cost information sits in several sources. The people investigating the problem need to bring it together before they can compare corrective actions. More than one function is involved, and the person accountable for a decision needs to be clear.
The project focuses on that work between identifying an issue and deciding what to do about it: understanding the cost, preparing the options and knowing which approvals are needed.
With Novagentica
Give the agent team a job it can be trusted to do.
The starting point is the business review: what the team needs to learn, which sources the agents may use and what a useful recommendation should contain. Those responsibilities are assigned before the agents run.
Business Authority sets the limits around the work. Financial thresholds define when spending needs approval. Exceptions have a named owner, so a recommendation that goes beyond the agreed limits reaches the right person with its supporting information.
How the work comes together
From the first signal to the next decisionThe starting point
Quality issue identified
Within agreed rules
Quality & cost evidence brought together
Within agreed rules
Corrective options prepared
Business Authority
Spending approvals applied
The result
Decision retained in Flight Recorder
People & decisions
The recommendation comes with the context.
Agents support the investigation and prepare the review. The responsible people retain the decisions on corrective action and the spending approvals defined for the project.
Flight Recorder keeps the decisions and their evidence together. The team can return to the review and understand what was considered, who was responsible and what was decided.
Achieved value · external benchmark
Less preparation. A clearer quality decision.
Bring the quality issue, cost analysis and corrective-action options into one review. The responsible owner can compare the options, approve the next action and keep the evidence behind the decision.
Toyota Industries
80%less time preparing daily standups
Toyota Industries reports an 80% reduction in preparation time for daily standup meetings in its paint-shop data and industrial-AI programme. This is a published external result in related automotive work.
Your value case
Make the improvement measurable.
Preparation time
Hours from the quality signal to a review pack with quality records, cost evidence and proposed actions.
Decision turnaround
Elapsed time from a complete review pack to the named owner’s corrective-action decision.
Traceability
Share of corrective actions with an owner, approval and linked supporting evidence.